#28: Check Your Wardrobe

This one is a bit confusing. He wasn’t wearing a jacket. This was hard proof he hadn’t done the crime since the substances were found inside the jacket of the perpetrator. Of course, when he comes to court, he’s wearing the jacket. That was a very dumb mistake. Still, if he wasn’t wearing it, then why would it matter?

Obviously, the judge didn’t care because the jacket in question was on the alleged suspect in question while sitting in the courtroom. Here’s to hoping it was the only jacket he owned; otherwise, that was one of the worst wardrobe decisions of the century. It should be displayed in Ripley’s Believe It or Not or maybe a Darwinism Museum.