Meg Ryan: Proof of Life

Stephen Holden of The New York Times criticized Proof of Life for lacking emotional depth, describing the film as stylish but soulless. Much of his critique centered on Meg Ryan’s performance, which he felt lacked the emotional intensity the role demanded.

According to Holden, Ryan conveyed frustration instead of the profound suffering required by the character, undermining the film’s impact. This criticism weighed heavily on Ryan, as her performance was singled out as a key factor in the movie’s failure to resonate with audiences, marking a challenging moment in her career.